"Because linsegr does not get to 0, as is the case of linseg and linen. They only get to 0 if the duration of performance is longer than the sum of segments. For
linsegr that can only be achieved by using xtratim alongside it."
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this.
Again two images, one of the csd and a waveform display. The linsegr envelope shows 0, .1, .8, 2, .8, .1, 0.
So the length of the segments is a sum of 2.2 seconds. However the score shows a note of shorter duration, only 1.5 seconds - .7 seconds shorter that the applied envelope therefore the duration of performance is less than the sum of segments. And once again the waveform display shows the release section fully reaching 0 at exactly 1.6 seconds as expected, without xtratim. Every sample following 1.6 seconds reports a value of 0. This seems to show that the linsegr in fact reaches 0 without any alterations or the necessity of using xtratim.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HjNRks_uTmwy6P5Le5C3lob5vNrYpgaA/view?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Hp1XbrSm7JnXCkkyPbJq_CZ7F-Utkhdl/view?usp=drivesdk
Csound mailing list
Csound@listserv.heanet.ie
https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND
Send bugs reports to
Issues · csound/csound · GitHub
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here